 |
The
Bald Man and the Fly
By Nikos Sarantakos,
Luxembourg
|
A surprising
chapter title in a bridge book, you may think. In fact it is
the title of one of Aesop's fables. In an English
translation, it reads:
A Fly bit the
bare head of a Bald Man who, endeavouring to destroy it,
gave himself a heavy slap. Escaping, the Fly said
mockingly, "You who have wished to revenge, even with death,
the prick of a tiny insect, see what you have done to
yourself to add insult to injury?"
For the classically
minded, this comes from Townsend's translation of the Fables
(1887); the Greek original of this fable is no longer with
us — Townsend took it from Phaedrus's Latin text of 1st
century A.D.
But this is by the
way. It occurred to us that there are many similar
situations at the bridge table. It often happens that one
side (the Man, not necessarily bald) holds the great
majority of points and is looking forward to a game, or
possibly a slam. The other side (the Fly) then makes an
impertinent overcall on meagre values. Instead of brushing
it aside and finding their contract, the point-laden pair
decide to teach them a lesson
(with a heavy double rather than slap). To add insult to
injury, it sometimes happens that the tiny, low-level enemy
contract makes!
Our first exhibit
comes from the match between Egypt and USA in the 1968
Olympiad.
Dealer: North. Love All.
|
| |
8 7 5 4
Q 8
Q J 5 3
Q 8 5 |
|
A 10
9 6
A 10
9 6 2
9 7 6 4 |
 |
J 5 4 3
A K 10 4
A K J
10 3 |
| |
K
Q J 3 2
K 9 7 6 2
8 7
2 |
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Mrs
Morcos |
Kay |
Shaffel |
Kaplan |
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1 |
1 |
|
Dbl |
End |
|
|
This was the era
before negative doubles had gained worldwide acceptance, so
West’s double was for penalties. What an awful call it was,
particular when holding four-card club support! Why try to
make seven tricks with spades as trumps, knowing there is a
bad trump break against you, rather than attempting 1NT or a
part-score in clubs? Mind you, her partner wasn't obliged to
stand for it and might well have taken it out, given his
spade void and attacking hand.
West led the
6 to
the queen and king. East cashed the ace of clubs and then
attempted to cash the king, which was fatal for the defence.
Doubtless he couldn’t believe that his partner would make a
one-level penalty double with four-card club support.
Declarer ruffed the second club
and led a low heart. West rose with the ace and returned the
9, which held, and then another diamond, ruffed by
declarer. The trump queen was allowed to win and Kaplan
played a heart to the queen, followed by a second round of
trumps to the jack and ace. West returned the ten of trumps
to declarer's king. Kaplan then played the
K
and claimed seven tricks.
This insulting 160
was added to the 400 gained by the US at the other table.
The US pair there were using negative doubles (in
fact, Al Roth had invented them!) but they didn’t have the
chance to emply the method. The Egyptian South, a stunningly
handsome amateur player who was surrounded by a swarm of
kibitzers (you guessed it… Omar Sharif),
made a take-out double instead of overcalling.
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Root |
Zanariri |
Roth |
Sharif |
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1 |
Dbl |
1 |
Pass |
2 |
Pass |
3 |
Pass |
5 |
End |
Al Roth and Bill
Root bid efficiently to the club game (3NT was a sound
alternative) and South led the king of spades to dummy's
ace. Roth discarded a heart from hand and advanced the nine
of diamonds. North split his honours and in the fullness of
time Roth was able to score 11 tricks even after misguessing
the trumps. He lost just one heart and one trump.
Sometimes the fly
can bite before the bald man, er...
the strong hand has had a chance to bid. This is what
happened in the 2000 Maastricht Olympiad.
Dealer: South.
E-W vulnerable
|
| |
Q 5
8 7 3
Q J 4
A Q 9 6 2 |
|
A K Q 10 6 4
A K 10 6
K J 5 |
 |
A J 9 6 2
J 9 5
8 5 3
7 4 |
| |
K 10 8 7 4 3
2
9 7 2
10 8 3 |
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Engel |
|
|
M.Branco |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Dbl |
End |
|
|
The South hand
may seem a bit light for a weak two bid, but at favourable
vulnerability and first to speak Brazil’s Marcelo Branco
couldn't resist the temptation. Zvi Engel, West for Belgium,
now had a real problem. Holding a game-forcing hand plus a
spade void, vulnerable against not, there was a real risk
that a double might be passed out for an inadequate penalty.
Engel did choose to double and partner passed it out. Who
can blame him?
Insult was added to
injury when Branco made his doubled contract. West led the
ace of hearts and now, to beat the contract, it is essential
to play hearts at every opportunity (East will discard a
diamond on the fourth round of hearts, depriving declarer of
a winner in the suit). The Belgian West chose to shift to a
low club at Trick 2 and in due time Branco collected 470.
Despite this
triumph there was (naturally!) a fly in the ointment for
Brazil. They gained only 9 IMPs because at the other table,
given a free run, the Brazilian East-West over-reached to
6 and duly went down.
So far we have seen
examples where the side that tries to swat the fly is able
to make game, but prefers to double a lowly part-score only
to see it make. What about a side having a slam available
and doubling a lowly enemy contract unsuccessfully? This
grotesque debacle has happened several times, even among
well-known champions.
Our first exhibit
comes from the semifinals of the 1998 Spingold teams. At the
first table, Meckstroth and Rodwell bid efficiently to the
good small slam in clubs, making twelve tricks. At the other
table the fly put in a late appearance but it then stung
forcefully:
Dealer: East.
N-S vulnerable
|
| |
9 7 5 2
K Q
Q 8 2
9 6 5 3 |
|
J 6
A 10 9
A J 9 3
J 10 7 2 |
 |
A K 8 4 3
3
5 4
A K Q 8 4 |
| |
Q 10
J 8 7 6 5 4 2
K 10 7 6
|
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Compton |
Freeman |
Onstott |
Nickell |
|
|
|
1 |
Pass |
|
1NT |
Pass |
2 |
2 |
|
Dbl |
End |
|
|
East-West
were playing a two-level response
as game-forcing, so West began
with a forcing 1NT response. We wonder what East would have
needed to rebid 3 .
He chose a humble 2 rebid, which
might have been made on a three-card suit, and the
magnificent club fit never came to light.
That said,
West's double of 2 was surely the main culprit. South knew
he was bidding at unfavourable vulnerability and would not
have stepped into the arena, on a passed hand, without
considerable distributional values. West’s trumps were
simply not good enough to venture a penalty double,
particularly when there were reasonable prospects of scoring
a game in his own direction. There was no defence against 2H
doubled. 670 plus 920 was worth an impressive 17 IMPs to the
Nickell squad.
Fly-hitting
accidents can happen even to the world’s top players and our
last example comes from the prestigious (but, alas, no
longer with us) Macallan tournament of 1998. All four
players at the table were among the world's elite.
Dealer: South. Love all
|
| |
K Q 6
K J 10 5 4 3
10 9 8 2
|
|
A J 9 7 5 2
9
A
A Q 8 5 2 |
 |
10 3
A Q 8 7 2
K 4
K J 6 4 |
| |
8 4
6
Q J 7 6 5 3
10 9 7 3 |
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Robson |
Helness |
Zia |
Helgemo |
|
|
|
|
Pass |
1 |
2 |
Pass |
Pass |
|
Dbl |
Pass |
Pass |
3 |
|
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl |
End |
West’s
reopening double seemed to hit the jackpot for a moment or
two. The fly... er… the Norwegians then flew to a more
hospitable spot and the second double did not meet with
success. Robson led his singleton heart to the ten and queen
and the defenders could not prevent declarer from disposing
of his four club losers in one way or another.
How do we
assign the blame here? West’s re-opening double on the
second round might well have picked up a big penalty against
2 . However, it is always dangerous to conceal the second
half of a big two-suiter. When you have a fit in the second
suit, partner will over-estimate his defensive values and
under-estimate how many tricks can be made by his own side.
Here the big club fit never came to light and Zia, uncertain
what game might be makeable by East-West, chose to defend
against 3 .
Note that
3 can be beaten, but only on the difficult ace of diamonds
lead. West must then switch to clubs and East has to play
the king of trumps if he comes in early with a heart.
A tiny
(fly-size) consolation for East-West was that not all pairs
who reached six clubs managed to make it. At the table of
Lauria-Versace, there was also a 2 overcall, but Alfredo
Versace as West reopened with an excellent 4 bid instead
of a double. The Italians soon found the good club slam and
efficient bidding was followed by efficient play. Versace
won the diamond lead and played a trump to the king. He led
a second trump through South, who inserted the 9, and then
played ace and another spade. He later
ruffed a spade with the
J and finessed the
8 on
the way back. Six clubs made.
By
contrast, Jeff Meckstroth, after winning the diamond lead,
laid down the ace of trumps at Trick 2. A tiny difference,
it seems, but now the slam could not be made! No longer able
to ruff a spade high and pick up South’s trumps, he went
down.
The opponents had put in a fly-weight bid
at Meckstroth's table and no doubt it was responsible for
the slam's failure. Germany’s Daniella von Arnim, sitting
South, had opened with a weak
2 . It therefore made sense for declarer to play South,
rather than North, to be short in clubs. Yes, some flies can
bite in devious ways! |